Legal Opinion
Art Goebel, Inc. v. North Suburban Agencies, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 14, 1997No. C6-96-695PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
Respondent Cleary Agency, Inc. (Cleary) is an independent insurance agency that was acting under a contract as an agent for appellant West Bend Insurance Company (West Bend). Cleary asserts that West Bend must indemnify it for costs and attorney fees it incurred in defending a meritless lawsuit brought by West Bend’s policyholder, Art Goebel, Inc. (Goebel). Goebel brought an action against Cleary alleging that Cleary negligently failed to procure the proper in surance coverage for Goebel with West Bend. The district court granted summary judgment for Cleary on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Republic National Life Insurance Co. v. Lorraine Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Matthew Carlsen v. GameStop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Cristen M. Gleason v. Norwest Mortgage, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.