Legal Opinion
Marzullo v. Kahl
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 12, 2001No. 10, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CATHELL, Judge.
Peter A. Kahl, respondent, used a parcel of land that was zoned R.C.4 for his residence and to operate Peter Kahl Reptiles, Inc. Mary Pat Marzullo and the People’s Counsel for Baltimore County, petitioners, filed a Petition for a Special Hearing before the Zoning Commissioner of Baltimore County for the determination of whether an R.C.4 zone permits respondent to conduct his business — the breeding, raising, and selling of reptiles. The Zoning Commissioner determined that respondent’s use was permitted in an R.C.4 zone.
Petitioners appealed to the Baltimore County Board of…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Board of Physician Quality Assurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Bulluck v. Pelham Wood ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Rockville Cars, LLC v. City of RockvilleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Maryland Aviation Administration v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Exelon Corp. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- People's Counsel v. SurinaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- PEOPLE'S COUNSEL FOR BALTIMORE CTY. v. Loyola CollegeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.