Legal Opinion

Frisk v. Frisk

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2005No. 20050051PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Daniel J. Frisk appealed a Domestic Violence Protection Order entered against him, claiming the district court erred in entering the protection order without explicitly finding actual or imminent domestic violence and without explaining the factual basis for its decision. We reverse the Domestic Violence Protection Order and remand to the district court for further proceedings.

[¶ 2] Daniel Frisk and Krista M. Frisk separated on May 9, 2004. Following their separation, Krista Frisk filed a Petition for Protective Relief. The district court issued a Temporary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mellum v. MellumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Peters-Riemers v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Botner v. BotnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. FerrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Gaab v. OchsnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Meier v. SaidNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Ficklin v. FicklinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Frisk v. FriskNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Hanneman v. NygaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API