Legal Opinion
Botner v. Botner
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 1996No. Civil 950268PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
William Botner appealed from a judgment requiring him to pay college expenses for his son, Corey Botner, under a 1978 divorce decree. We affirm.
William and Rosalie Botner were divorced in 1978. They had three children during their marriage, Chad, Corey, and Collin. At the time of the divorce the children were ages 12, 8, and 7, respectively, and all are now adults. William and Rosalie executed a written stipulation regarding the incidents of the divorce, which was incorporated into the divorce decree.
In February 1993 Corey brought an action against William to enforce the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sullivan v. QuistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Hummel v. Mid Dakota Clinic, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Anderson v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Johnson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Sprynczynatyk v. MillsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Steffes v. SteffesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Jorgenson v. RatajczakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Serr v. SerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Bies v. ObregonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Kukla v. KuklaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.