Hanneman v. Nygaard
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Arden Nygaard appeals from a domestic violence protection order prohibiting him from committing domestic violence against Rhonda Hanneman or from having direct or indirect contact with her. Nygaard argues the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss oh the ground of res judicata and there was insufficient evidence to support the domestic violence protection order. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Hanneman and Nygaard have two children together from a previous relationship. On March 11, 2009, the district court issued an order prohibiting Hanne-man from initiating direct or…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kern v. HettingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Riverwood Commercial Park, L.L.C. v. Standard Oil Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Ungar v. North Dakota State UniversityNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Rothberg v. RothbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Steckler v. StecklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Swanson v. SwansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Combs v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Niska v. FalconerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Lindstaedt v. GeorgeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Norberg v. NorbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.