Legal Opinion

Frisk v. Frisk

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2006No. 20050391PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Daniel Frisk appeals from an amended domestic violence protection order entered against him. We conclude the district court made sufficient findings of actual or imminent domestic violence to support the amended order, and we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Daniel and Krista Frisk separated on May 9, 2004. Following the separation, Krista Frisk filed a petition for protective relief, and the district court issued a temporary domestic violence protection order. The parties submitted affidavits, and on June 3, 2004, an evidentiary hearing was held, but before the conclusion of the hearing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Felton v. FeltonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. GO Committee Ex Rel. Hale v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Lovcik v. EllingsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Lucke v. LuckeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wessman v. WessmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Carlson v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Orwig v. OrwigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. CainNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Richter v. N.D. Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API