Legal Opinion
Peters-Riemers v. Riemers
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 23, 2001No. 20000145PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Roland C. Riemers appeals a domestic violence protection order restraining him from contact with Jenese A. Peters Riemers, We affirm the protection order.
I
[¶ 2] On March 6, 2000, Peters-Riem-ers applied for domestic violence protection from Riemers. In her application, Peters-Riemers attested that she and Riemers had been involved in a verbal and physical confrontation on March 4, 2000. She packed a bag and told Riemers she was taking their two-year-old son with her •to stay in a hotel. Riemers told her she could not take their son, and the parties began struggling.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Cesare v. CesareSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Olander Contracting Co. v. Gail Wachter InvestmentsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Cass County State's Attorney v. R.A.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Erickson v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Riemers v. O'HALLORANNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Peters-Riemers v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.