Legal Opinion

Gaab v. Ochsner

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 2001No. 20010112PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Clarence Ochsner appeals from a domestic violence protection order dated March 7, 2001, which extended a prior domestic violence protection order for two years. We hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in extending the protection order, and we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Lina Gaab and Clarence Ochsner were involved in a relationship from 1993 until May of 2000. On August 15, 2000, Gaab filed a petition for a domestic violence protection order against Ochsner. In her affidavit in support of the petition, Gaab recounted a dinner date she had with Ochsner at the V.F.W. club…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Steckler v. StecklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Peters-Riemers v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Lovcik v. EllingsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Lucke v. LuckeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Maldonado v. MaldonadoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Frisk v. FriskNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Frisk v. FriskNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Uren v. Dakota Dust-Tex, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Saville v. UdeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API