Gaab v. Ochsner
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Clarence Ochsner appeals from a domestic violence protection order dated March 7, 2001, which extended a prior domestic violence protection order for two years. We hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in extending the protection order, and we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Lina Gaab and Clarence Ochsner were involved in a relationship from 1993 until May of 2000. On August 15, 2000, Gaab filed a petition for a domestic violence protection order against Ochsner. In her affidavit in support of the petition, Gaab recounted a dinner date she had with Ochsner at the V.F.W. club…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Steckler v. StecklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Peters-Riemers v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Lovcik v. EllingsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Lucke v. LuckeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Maldonado v. MaldonadoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Frisk v. FriskNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Frisk v. FriskNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Uren v. Dakota Dust-Tex, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Saville v. UdeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.