Legal Opinion

Wolt v. Wolt

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2010No. 20090126PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Steve Wolt appeals from a domestic violence protection order restraining him from contact with Kathy Wolt for two years until April 7, 2011. Because we conclude the district court did not err in denying Steve Wolt’s motion to dismiss and did not err in granting the domestic violence protection order, we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] This appeal stems from an order granting Kathy Wolt’s petition for a domestic violence protection order. Kathy Wolt and Steve Wolt had been engaged in contentious divorce proceedings, culminating in a two-day trial in January 2009 and a final divorce…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Riverwood Commercial Park, L.L.C. v. Standard Oil Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Steckler v. StecklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Peters-Riemers v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Lovcik v. EllingsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. R.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Hanneman v. NygaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Niska v. FalconerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Lenton v. LentonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API