Legal Opinion

Meier v. Said

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2007No. 20060248PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Mohamed H. Said appealed from a disorderly conduct restraining order directing him to have no contact with Brean-na Meier for two years. Said argues that the district court erroneously allowed Meier to testify about allegations not con tained in the petition for relief, and that the district court abused its discretion because there were no reasonable grounds to support the issuance of the restraining order. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Said and Meier had a brief relationship which began in late 2005. In December 2005, Meier moved from North Dakota to California to live…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wetzel v. SchlenvogtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Gullickson v. KlineNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. May v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. PalmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. PalmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Hoggarth v. KroppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Westby v. SchmidtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Harris v. HarrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Matter of J.D.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API