Armstrong v. Sacramento Valley Realty Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PREWETT, P. J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and respondent and against the appellants in an action brought ^gainst them to enforce the terms of a contract dated on April 27, 1917. Though the record in the case is somewhat voluminous, the actual matters in dispute may he brought down to a very narrow compass.
On December 6, 1910, the respondent and other persons owned 1,251 shares of the capital stock of ArmstrongQuatman Co., a corporation, and the appellant Mrs. Quatman owned the remaining 1,249 shares. On said day said corporation entered into a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parsons v. AmbosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Armstrong v. Sacramento Valley R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Town of Bristol v. Bristol & Warren Water WorksSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1896
- Grosvenor v. FlintSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1897
- Magee v. MageeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Miller v. DyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Wilk v. VencillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- San Francisco Design Center Associates v. Portman CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Wheat v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.