Miller v. Dyer
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
this action for specific performance of In a contract for the exchange of real property and for damages occasioned by delay in performance, the trial court sustained general and special demurrers to the second amended complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiffs have appealed from judgments of dismissal entered upon their refusal to amend.
The complaint sets forth the following allegations: Defendant Mabelle Dyer agreed by written contract to pay the plaintiffs $250, to convey to them certain real property that she owned, to negotiate a loan of $2,000 on a parcel of realty owned by defendants…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Easton v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Jackson v. TorrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Abbott v. the 76 Land and Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Healy v. Visalia & Tulare R.R.California Supreme Court · 1894
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Renner v. CrismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- Gavina v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- United Professional Planning, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.