Legal Opinion

Town of Bristol v. Bristol & Warren Water Works

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 28, 1896PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Bill in Equity for specific performance. On demurrer.

1Opinion of the CourtTillinghast, J.

The substantial allegations of the bill, in so far as the same ■ are material to the questions raised by the demurrers, are as follows, viz :—

1. That on the 30th of January, 1882, the town of Bristol entered into a contract with the respondent George H. Norman, for the construction of a system of water works for supplying pure water to said town.

2. That, by said contract, said town granted to said Norman, his successors and assigns,' the exclusive right and use of the public streets, squares and lanes of said town for the purpose of laying water pipes, and of continuing the same therein and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coles v. PeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Biddle v. RamseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  3. Herrman v. BabcockIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Castle Creek Water Co. v. City of AspenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. Kennebec Water District v. City of WatervilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1902
  3. City of Eau Claire v. Eau Claire Water Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Smith v. DavidSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  5. Calore Rigging Corp. v. Sterling Engineering & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API