Legal Opinion

San Francisco Design Center Associates v. Portman Companies

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1995No. A059616PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMONS, J. *

The competition privilege is an affirmative defense to the tort of interference with prospective economic advantage. We hold that to defeat the privilege plaintiff must prove defendants committed an unlawful or illegitimate act which is independently actionable.

Facts 1 and Procedural History

In December of 1985, plaintiff San Francisco Design Center Associates purchased real property at 555 Ninth Street, San Francisco (the Greyhound site), from Greyhound Corporation, intending to develop it as a wholesale furniture mart. Plaintiff’s principals Robert Fippinger and Michael…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Saunders v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Youst v. LongoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Lowell v. Mother's Cake & Cookie Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Reeves v. HanlonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Arntz Contracting Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. PMC, Inc. v. Saban Entertainment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Global Eagle Entertainment, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API