Legal Opinion

Magee v. Magee

California Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1917No. Sac. No. 2285PublishedCited by 23 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Solano County, and from an order refusing a new trial. A. J. Buckles, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This action was brought to quiet title to a lot of land in the city of Vallejo. In their answer the defendants denied plaintiff’s title, and set up, by way of further defense and as a cross-complaint, a state of facts in consequence of which, as they claimed, they were the equitable owners of the property, or entitled to a conveyance thereof from the plaintiff. The court made findings in accordance with the affirmative allegations of the answer and cross-complaint and entered judgment accordingly. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Agard v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Stanton v. SingletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. White v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Stiles v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Monsen v. MonsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Beverage v. Canton Placer Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Bard v. KentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. In Re Estate of BrixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API