Magee v. Magee
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Solano County, and from an order refusing a new trial. A. J. Buckles, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This action was brought to quiet title to a lot of land in the city of Vallejo. In their answer the defendants denied plaintiff’s title, and set up, by way of further defense and as a cross-complaint, a state of facts in consequence of which, as they claimed, they were the equitable owners of the property, or entitled to a conveyance thereof from the plaintiff. The court made findings in accordance with the affirmative allegations of the answer and cross-complaint and entered judgment accordingly. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Agard v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Stanton v. SingletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- White v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Stiles v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Monsen v. MonsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Beverage v. Canton Placer Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Bard v. KentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re Estate of BrixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.