Legal Opinion
Wilk v. Vencill
California Supreme Court
Decided May 13, 1947No. L. A. 19745PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
This appeal is from a judgment of the superior court dismissing an action for specific performance or damages after defendants’ demurrers to plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint had been sustained without leave to amend.
The following facts are alleged in the fourth amended complaint. Defendants, husband and wife, are the owners in joint tenancy of a house and lot. On July 24, 1945, plaintiff and defendant husband executed the following agreement:
“Received of Nat Wilk, the sum of Ten Dollars as part payment for my real property located at 425 North Martel Ave., Los Angeles, California.
“The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Delanoy v. DelanoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Wilson v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Hunter v. SparlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Gill v. Hearst Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Helene Marceau Sidebotham v. W. L. Robison, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Sidebotham, Deceased, and Robert Sidebotham and James SidebothamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Ruinello v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.