Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Graham

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 11, 2000No. C4-86-1715PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent, Chester C. Graham, has been licensed to practice law in Minnesota since October 1983. Since that- time, he has had an extensive disciplinary history. In February 1985, Graham was admonished for incompetence, neglect, and misrepresentation; in October, 1986, he was publicly reprimanded and given two years supervised probation for neglect, failure to communicate with a client, false statements, and failure to cooperate with the disciplinary investigation; in March 1987, while still on probation, Graham received an admonition for failure to cooperate with a disciplinary…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. In Re the Discipline of SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against HaugenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LaChapelleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against MontezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against WestbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API