Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against LaChapelle

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 23, 1992No. C0-91-1953PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action on September 30, 1991. Respondent is charged with:

Intentionally misappropriating client funds,

Making misrepresentations to the client about such funds,

Making misrepresentations to the District Ethics Committee investigator and the director’s office to avoid detection of the misappropriation,

Failing to maintain proper client trust account records,

Failing to supervise the person in his office responsible for maintaining the client trust account records, and

Falsely certifying to the supreme…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Discipline of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LochowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PylesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Matter of Discipline of FlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against De RyckeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GrzybekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against VaughtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API