Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Randall
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 8, 1997No. C3-96-721PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility brought a disciplinary complaint against respondent Michael H. Randall alleging, among other misconduct, that Randall misappropriated client funds; charged clients for work he did not perform; and engaged in dishonesty to cover up his misconduct. A hearing was held before a court-appointed referee. The referee issued findings of fact and conclusions of law, and recommended disbarment, as well as imposition of costs and attorney fees. Because neither the director nor Randall ordered a transcript of the hearing within 10…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against LaChapelleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Petition for Discipl. Act. Against WeemsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against SwerineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Matter of Discipline of ParksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by20 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SelmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In re Disciplinary Action Against FruSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.