Legal Opinion
In re Disciplinary Action Against Montez
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 22, 2012No. A11-0125PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for discipline against respondent Angela Montgomery Montez, now known as Angela Montgomery,1 alleging numerous violations of the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct. The petition alleged that Montgomery’s failure to place an advance fee payment in trust; failure to remit unearned client fees; false statements to the client, to successor counsel, to a fee arbitration panel, and to the Director; and failure to comply with a binding fee arbitration award violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.15(a)2 and…
3Cases cited34 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by34 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against NathansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Mark Alan GREENMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 228990Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Jesse David MATSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0389131Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- In re Disciplinary Action Against NwaneriSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- In re Disciplinary Action Against PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.