Legal Opinion
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Isaacs
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 9, 1990No. C6-84-2215PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Respondent Clark F. Isaacs, who was given a stayed five-year suspension in a 1987 disciplinary proceeding, is charged with violating the conditions of his stayed suspension and several rules of professional conduct. Respondent is charged with misappropriating client funds from his trust account, failing to maintain proper trust account records, neglecting client matters, failing to return a client file, and failing to adequately communicate with clients. A referee and the Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (“Director”) recommend respondent be disbarred from the practice of…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Matter of Discipline of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Matter of Discipline of SimonsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Matter of Discipline of JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Matter of Discipline of BealSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by49 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against LyonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against WestbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against GrzybekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against HaugenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.