Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Haugen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 16, 1996No. C6-85-1544PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent, Marlon 0. Haugen, is an attorney who has been practicing law in Minnesota since 1954.

This disciplinary proceeding was initiated by the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) after the Director received notice that Haugen’s trust account was overdrawn on December 18, 1991. The Director commenced an audit of Haugen’s trust account. -That audit identified a number of trust account violations. As a result, the Director filed this petition for disciplinary action.

The petition alleges two counts of unprofessional conduct warranting public…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LochowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Application of GahanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against KinnunenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by28 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GheritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against MontezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GrzybekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Mark Alan GREENMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 228990Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API