Legal Opinion
In Re the Discipline of Serstock
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 5, 1982No. 44297PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Per curiam
This case is before the court on petition from the Director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board. Respondent Ellsworth Irving Serstock stipulated to a suspension in 1980 pending final determination of this disciplinary proceeding, and a hearing on the petition for disciplinary action was held by Retired District Judge Ben Grussendorf in May 1981. Referee Grus-sendorf recommended either an indefinite suspension for at least 3 years or disbarment of the respondent. We have decided that disbarment must be the appropriate discipline in this case.
Respondent Serstock was admitted to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- In Re Discipline of BunkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- In Re Application for Discipline of HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- In Re the Discipline of ShawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Matter of Discipline of PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against LochowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against MadsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.