Gerberich v. Southern California Edison Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A hearing was granted in this case in order to give further consideration to the contention of defendant that it could not be deemed negligent in maintaining its power pole in a location approved by public authority. We are now satisfied with the conclusion reached by the District Court of Appeal, and hereby adopt the following opinion of Mr. Justice Scott pro tempore, as part of the opinion of this court.
“Plaintiffs sued to recover damages for alleged wrongful death of their daughter. At conclusion of the testimony the trial court directed the jury to return a verdict in favor of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Lacy v. Pacific Gas Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
- Barrett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Waldorf v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Ben v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Sandstoe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- McMillan v. State Highway CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.