Palmquist v. Mercer
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpbncb, J.
Plaintiff sought damages for personal injuries sustained-by him while riding a horse which he had rented from a riding academy. At the close of plaintiff’s case, the court granted defendants’ motions for nonsuit, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment subsequently entered. Upon consideration of the record, we have concluded that plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to require submission of the case to the jury as to defendant Mercer, who was the owner of the riding academy, but that the nonsuit was properly granted as to the other defendants.
A motion for nonsuit may properly be granted “. . .…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Blumberg v. M. & T. IncorporatedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Card v. BomsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- McDonald v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Warner v. Santa Catalina Island Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.