Legal Opinion
Sandstoe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 23, 1938No. Civ. 11820PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT
Plaintiff appeals from the judgment in favor of defendant City of Pasadena in an action to recover damages for personal injuries, entered after the trial court sustained the city’s demurrer to the third amended complaint without leave to amend.
According to plaintiff’s allegations, she was riding as a passenger in an automobile being driven in an easterly direction on Walnut Street in the City of Pasadena at 1:30 A. M. on December 24,1937. The atmosphere was extremely foggy and the automobile collided with a wigwag signal which had been placed by defendant railroad company in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Shea v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Rafferty v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.