McMillan v. State Highway Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*49Cavanagh, J.
The lower courts ruled, as a matter of law, that Detroit Edison owed no duty of reasonable care to an occupant of a vehicle which leaves the traveled portion of the highway and strikes a utility pole located on the median. We reverse.
On January 10, 1976, plaintiff Tamara McMillan1 was a passenger in an automobile traveling south on Woodward Avenue in the City of Royal Oak. Woodward is a state-owned highway. At the point in question, the north- and southbound lanes are separated by a grassy median strip. The vehicle was struck by a hit-and-run driver, went out of control, and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Clark v. DalmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Fiser v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
- Hyde v. County of RensselaerNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- MacK v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Lowe v. Estate Motors Ltd.Michigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. LumpkinMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.