Legal Opinion

Lacy v. Pacific Gas Electric Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1934No. Docket No. Sac. 4817PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

After a re-examination of the authorities applicable to the legal issues involved in this cause, we find ourselves in accord with the opinion of the District Court of Appeal handed down by said court when this action was pending therein. The queston concerning which we were in doubt when we granted a hearing herein was whether the appellate court had properly applied the doctrine of proximate cause to the facts in this case, where the defendant was held liable for injuries sustained by plaintiff by reason of the negligence of Gage in driving his automobile over the power line pole which the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Falk v. FinkelmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Pastene v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Milbury v. Turner Centre SystemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Carroll v. Central Counties Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Connor v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Stasulat v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Gibson v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API