Legal Opinion
Norton v. City of Pomona
California Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1935No. L. A. 15445PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A hearing was granted in this case in order to consider more fully the contention of defendant Southern California Edison Company, Ltd., that it could not be deemed negligent in maintaining its power pole in a location approved by public authority. The same point was involved in Gerberich v. Southern California Edison Co., L. A. 14528 (ante, p. 46 [53 Pac. (2d) 948]), this day decided, and we there approved the holding of the District Court of Appeal. In conformity with the conclusion reached therein, we hereby adopt the following opinion of Mr. Justice pro tern. Willis as the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gorman v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Estate of PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Thompson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Bancroft v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Fifield Manor v. FinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Johnston v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.California Supreme Court · 1943
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.