Legal Opinion

Ben v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1929No. Docket No. 6942PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCAS, J., pro tem.

This action was brought by plaintiff and respondent Lim Ben as the administrator of the estate of Lim Sing Pong, deceased, to recover damages for the death of said decedent, due, it is alleged, to the negligence of the defendant corporation, appellant herein. A jury returned a $15,000 verdict for respondent and from the judgment thereon appeal is taken on the following grounds: (1) that the evidence was insufficient to support the implied finding of the jury that there was actionable negligence on the part of appellant; (2) that decedent was guilty of contributory…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Carroll v. Central Counties Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Beyerle v. CliftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Reinders v. OlsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Webber v. Bank of TracyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Polk v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. George v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Stallings v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  4. Beauchamp v. Los Gatos Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Parker v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API