Rummel v. Flowers
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
R. C. 4123.519 provides in part: “The claimant or the employer may appeal a decision of the Industrial Commission in any injury case, other than a decision as to the extent of disability, to the Court of Common Pleas * #
The pivotal question presented in this appeal is whether the decision of the administrator, affirmed by the Regional Board of Review, was a decision “other than a decision as to the extent of disability, ’ ’ and hence appealable to the Common Pleas Court by virtue of the above-cited section. r
Two basic principles of law enunciated by this court in its decisions interpreting…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- State ex rel. Campbell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Industrial Commission v. HogleOhio Supreme Court · 1923
- Noggle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Zavatsky v. StringerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Cook v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Grant v. Ohio Department of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Gilbert v. Midland-Ross Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.