Legal Opinion

Rummel v. Flowers

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1972No. 71-90PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

R. C. 4123.519 provides in part: “The claimant or the employer may appeal a decision of the Industrial Commission in any injury case, other than a decision as to the extent of disability, to the Court of Common Pleas * #

The pivotal question presented in this appeal is whether the decision of the administrator, affirmed by the Regional Board of Review, was a decision “other than a decision as to the extent of disability, ’ ’ and hence appealable to the Common Pleas Court by virtue of the above-cited section. r

Two basic principles of law enunciated by this court in its decisions interpreting…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State ex rel. Campbell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Industrial Commission v. HogleOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Noggle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Zavatsky v. StringerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Cook v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Grant v. Ohio Department of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Gilbert v. Midland-Ross Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API