Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1929No. 21905PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The relator, Edward O. Kauffman, was claimant against the workmen's compensation fund for injuries alleged to have been suffered in the course of employment on or about July 1, 1925. Compensation was allowed by the Industrial Commission, and paid until April 4, 1926, at which time further compensation was denied. Thereupon the usual steps were taken to perfect an appeal to the court of common pleas, and on December 21, 1927, relator recovered a verdict before the court of common pleas of Hamilton county, Ohio, which verdict was in the usual form: "We, the jury, being duly impaneled and sworn,…

2Cited by34 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Logsdon v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State ex rel. Mansour v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Rummel v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1972

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API