State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The question is: Do the facts stated in the petition entitle the relator to a rehearing? In other words, are the findings and decisions of the Commission as set forth in the petition such as entitle the relator to an appeal?
The case was presented to this court upon the general assumption that the order of the Commission of June 7, 1933, was a final decision upon jurisdictional grounds, and, since it denied claimant's right to continue to receive compensation, that it was appealable. Because the "Application for Rehearing" was not filed within the required time, the principal contention was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- Perkins v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Humphries v. Wheeling Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
- Rummel v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
- Welsh v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.