Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Hogle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1923No. 17288PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

Epitomized Opinion

Hogle was injured while working for the Mt. Vernon Bridge Co., which was a subscriber to the state insurance fund. The Industrial Commission heard his claim and ordered compensation to be disbursed *844from the state insurance fund and ordered the doctor’s hijlis paid, but made no order as to compensation to be paid Hogle and took no final action fixing the amount of compensation. Hogle appealed to the Common Pleas, where a verdict was rendered for him. The judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. Error was prosecuted to this court. Held:

Attorneys — John G. Price, Atty.…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State ex rel. Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Industrial Commission v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Noggle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Ethen v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API