Legal Opinion

Cook v. Mayfield

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1989No. 88-1009PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Re snick, J.

The issue before this court is whether an order by the Industrial Commission which denies a claim for further compensation apparently because of an “intervening incident” is a decision other than “as to the extent of disability.” Deciding whether a decision is other than as to the extent of disability is not a new issue for this court. In fact it is a threshold question for courts to decide when determining if there is subject-matter jurisdiction over a decision appealed from the Industrial Commission.2 This is because the commission has authority “to determine all rights of claimants.”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Jenkins v. KellerOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Zavatsky v. StringerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State ex rel. Bosch v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State ex rel. Campbell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Valentine v. PPG Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State ex rel. Evans v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. McHenry v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API