E.O.C. Ord, Inc. v. Kovakovich
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STONE (W. A.), J.
This appeal presents the issue whether the two-year statute of limitations for an action based upon an oral contract or the four-year statute for an action based upon a contract founded on an instrument in writing applies to the particular facts found by the trial court. Because we will hold that the four-year statute applies, we will address the additional issue of when plaintiff’s contract action accrued in order to determine whether the action was timely filed.
It was March of 1978 when respondent Kovakovich 1 contacted appellant E.O.C. Ord, an attorney certified as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Amen v. Merced County Title Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Tabata v. MuraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Benard v. WalkupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jones v. JacobsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Toledano Ex Rel. Estate of deToledano v. O'ConnorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Martini E Ricci Lamino S.P.A.-Consortile Societa Agricola v. Trinity Fruit Sales Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Mitchell v. AMERICAN FAIR CREDIT ASS'NCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Fawer v. EvansMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.