Legal Opinion

Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHugh

California Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1913No. S.F. No. 6194PublishedCited by 162 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for the conversion by defendant of some seventy-five tons of type metal belonging to plaintiff, and alleged to be of the value of $6,750. The cause was tried without a jury, and the court, finding that the defendant had not converted any of the type metal to his own use, entered judgment in his favor. The plaintiff appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

The appellant’s principal contention is that the evidence does not support the finding that defendant had not been guilty of the conversion alleged. We are unable to give our assent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Swim v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Perkins v. Maier & Zobelein BreweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by162 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Jarchow v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Juchert v. California Water Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1940

157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API