Legal Opinion

Martini E Ricci Lamino S.P.A.-Consortile Societa Agricola v. Trinity Fruit Sales Co.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 2, 2014No. Case No. 1:13-CV-276 AWI SABPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.

This case stems from the provision of kiwi fruit from Plaintiff Martini E Ricci Iamno S.P.A. (“M & R”) to Trinity Fruit Sales Company, Inc. (“Trinity”). The active complaint is the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). M & R alleges five causes of action against Trinity in the FAC: (1) breach of contract under the United Nations Convention for the International Sale of Goods (“CISG”);1 (2) breach of written contract; (3) price of goods; (4) account stated; and (5) open book account. M & R now moves for summary judgment,…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Martini E Ricci Iamino S.P.A.—Consortile Societa Agricola v. Western Fresh Marketing Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
  2. Bitisillie v. HaalandDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
  3. Courtesy Automotive Group, Inc. v. Subaru of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. Malachowski v. DohenyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  5. Moreno v. Nev. Dept. Corr.District Court, D. Nevada · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API