Mitchell v. AMERICAN FAIR CREDIT ASS'N
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMONS, J.
The Legislature enacted the Credit Services Act of 1984 (CSA) (Civ. Code, § 1789.10 et seq.) in response to certain business practices of credit services organizations. These organizations offer to obtain credit or improve the credit standing of consumers who have experienced credit problems. The CSA sought to provide consumers with information necessary to decide whether or not to purchase such services, by requiring certain disclosures and by mandating that every credit services contract be in writing and signed by the buyer. In this case, as a matter of first impression,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baker v. Osborne Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Stroud v. TUNZICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Lacayo v. Catalina Rest. Grp. Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Adir International v. The Travelers Indemnity CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Glaser, Weil, Fink, Jacobs & Shapiro, LLP v. GoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.