Legal Opinion

Benard v. Walkup

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1969No. Civ. 25489PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, P. J.

In these consolidated legal malpractice actions, defendant Edward Stern appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant Bruce Walkup, James C. Downing, E. Robert Wallach and Gerald C. Sterns (hereinafter referred to as “Walkup”). The questions on appeal involve the application of the statute of limitations to claims of malpractice on the part of consecutive attorneys retained by plaintiff. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we conclude that the judgments must be affirmed.

Facts

On May 4, 1961, plaintiff was injured in an automobile…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Neal v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Ralph W. Moores, Jr. v. Nathan Greenberg, Ralph W. Moores, Jr. v. Nathan GreenbergCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
  4. Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Adams v. PaulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API