Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1969No. Civ. 27310PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

We have issued alternative writs of mandate and prohibition by means of which the petitioners, in effect, seek to compel dismissal of an action commenced against them, for failure (1) to serve and return summons within three years as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 581a, and (2) to bring the action to trial within two years (Code Civ. Proc., § 583). The superior court had denied a motion to dismiss taken under the authority of those code sections.

We first consider the proceedings as they relate to the failure to serve and return summons within three years.

Code…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Gonsalves v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Rose v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Black Bros. Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Lambert v. ConradCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tresway Aero, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Hocharian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Busching v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Johnson & Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Semole v. SansoucieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API