Legal Opinion

Johnson & Johnson v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1985No. S.F. 24760PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

When a summons and complaint are served by mail on a person outside this state within three years of the commencement of an action, must a return receipt be obtained and filed within those three years to satisfy Code of Civil Procedure section 581a?

I

This case involves three separate civil actions arising from injuries allegedly caused by in útero exposure to the drug diethylstilbestrol (DES).

Petitioner is successor in interest to McNeil Laboratories, Inc., a DES manufacturer. Plaintiffs/real parties in interest in the three actions are all represented by the same counsel and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hocharian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Crown Coach Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Lambert v. ConradCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Cruz v. Fagor America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Khajavi v. Feather River Anesthesia Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Newport Components, Inc. v. NEC Home Electronics (U.S.A.), Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API