Legal Opinion

Gonsalves v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1940No. Sac. 5384PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

This is an action to recover the amount of a bank deposit, with interest and damages. The facts are stipulated.

On June 18, 1929, plaintiff Joe S. Gonsalves and his wife made a demand note in the sum of $5,360 to defendant’s predecessor. The note was secured by a chattel mortgage. In 1932 defendant sold the secured property and partially satisfied the obligation, leaving a deficiency of $2,238.60. The note was then assigned to H. C. Winklemen for the purpose of collecting the balance due.

On June 15, 1933, Winklemen filed his action on the note in the San Francisco Superior Court, against…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Goddard v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. People v. Kings County Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Dexter v. PiersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Cook v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Pendleton v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Kruger v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Tresway Aero, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API