Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Conrad

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 1960No. Civ. 24554PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment made pursuant to section 581a of the Code of Civil Procedure dismissing her action as to certain defendants based upon a failure to return the summons to the clerk within three years after commencement of the action.

Plaintiff also attempts to appeal from an order denying her motion to vacate and set aside the judgment of dis missal, but this attempted appeal must be dismissed because “the attempt to appeal from the order refusing vacation of the order of dismissal is but a repetition of plaintiff’s appeal from such last…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Stafford v. Realty Bond Service Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Gonsalves v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. People v. Leong FookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Hays v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. American Friends Service Committee v. ProcunierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API