Hocharian v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BIRD, C. J.
This court must decide what criteria govern operation of the mandatory dismissal provision of Code of Civil Procedure section 581a, under which a summons on a complaint must be served and return made within three years after an action is filed, in view of the implied exceptions to the statute as recognized in Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. Preston (1958) 50 Cal.2d 736 [329 P.2d 489].
I
A third party cause of action was filed against General Motors Corporation, Paramount Chemical Corporation, Harold Beasley, dba Arco Service Station, and Does I through XXX on August 30, 1976. The…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Patricia Scott Anderson v. Air West, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Steketee v. Lintz, Williams & RothbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Nelson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Barrington v. A. H. Robins Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Salas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1986
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.