Legal Opinion

Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. Preston

California Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1958No. L. A. 24332PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff appeals from two orders: (1) the order dismissing its action as to defendant Bush; and (2) the subsequent order denying its motion to vacate the dismissal. It contends that the dismissal was improper because of a prior binding adjudication that defendant Bush was concealing himself to avoid service of summons during the final days of the three-year period provided for such service (Code Civ. Proc., § 581a) and because thereafter Bush was served within a reasonable time, that is one week, following the expiration of said three-year period. We have concluded that plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gonsalves v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Rose v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Rue v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Town of Santa Monica v. GuidingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Wiggin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Watts v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Tresway Aero, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Hocharian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. J. C. Penney Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Woley v. TurkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API