Legal Opinion

Rose v. Knapp

California Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1951No. L. A. 21556PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

This appeal involves the propriety of the trial court’s dismissal of a quiet title action pursuant to a motion made by defendants June Knapp and Mattie Hye on the ground that plaintiff had failed to bring the action to trial within five years after the filing of the complaint and that dismissal was mandatory under section 583 of the Code of Civil Procedure. *

More than 20 years ago, in 1929, Lorn Betty, plaintiff’s predecessor, recovered a money judgment against Ellen Crowder and her son, E. W. Knapp. Betty then brought an action to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance of real property…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Judson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Estate of HormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Tresway Aero, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Moran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hocharian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API