Cobe v. Crane
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Mateo County, from an order refusing to allow an intervention, and from an order refusing a new trial. George- H. Buck, -fudge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Arthur Crane, C. M. Jennings, and Paul T. Olivier, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff sued Arthur Crane, Alice Aalwyn, and Aalwyn’s Law Institute, to quiet title to certain described land. He charged the commencement by defendant Crane, in his own name and in the name of Alice Aalwyn, of actions without merit, designed to harass and vex him, to cloud the title to his land and interfere with the sale of it. He charged the Aalwyn’s Law Institute to be a mere instrumentality of the defendant Arthur Crane for the accomplishment of this same end, and sought a decree quieting his title against these defendants and enjoining them from further prosecution of any action…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Angus v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People ex rel. Love v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Aalwyn v. CobeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Haggin v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thomson v. ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Wood v. HenleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Sheldon v. La Brea Materials Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Holland v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Taylor v. HawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.