Haggin v. Kelly
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiffs averred ownership and right of possession in a certain mining claim; that defendants are in possession of the property, and wrongfully and unlawfully withhold the same; that they have taken, and are taking, large quantities of gold and silver ore therefrom; that plaintiffs have demanded of defendants that they desist from mining the claim and from taking and removing the ore, but they refuse to do so, and threaten to continue their mining operations; plaintiffs are unable to determine how much gold and silver defendants are taking or will take from the mine; defendants are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Payne & Dewey v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Curtis v. SutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Natoma Water & Mining Co. v. ClarkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Hughes v. DunlapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Gillespie v. GoulyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by20 opinions
- Empire Investment Co. v. MortCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Corea v. HigueraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Shields v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Reiner v. SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Southern Pacific Land Co. v. DickersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.