Legal Opinion

Aalwyn v. Cobe

California Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1914No. S.F. No. 6371PublishedCited by 23 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiff sued to quiet title to land claimed by her and in addition to the ordinary allegations in a complaint under sections 738 et seq., of the Code of Civil Procedure, set up certain alleged fraudulent acts whereby her title was clouded. She asked for general equitable relief in addition to the usual prayer that her title to the property should be quieted. Defendants Ira M. Cobe and S. W. Swabey demurred generally and specially. On August 12, 1912, the demurrer was sustained and on August 29, 1912, defendants Cobe and Swabey moved that plaintiff should be denied leave to amend her…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McClatchy v. Superior Court of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Burris v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Prince v. LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Estate of YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Schaake v. Eagle Automatic Can Co.California Supreme Court · 1902

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Philbrook v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Haddad v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API